Editorial Policy & Review Process

We publish practical food safety guidance grounded in reputable sources and expert review. This page explains how we create, review, and update content.

Our Standards

  • Use primary, authoritative sources (FDA, USDA, CDC, WHO, university extensions).
  • Present conservative, safety‑first guidance; when in doubt, recommend discarding.
  • Disclose uncertainty and note when ranges depend on handling and storage.
  • Avoid medical claims; we do not diagnose or provide individualized medical advice.

Source Guidelines

Each page includes a Sources section and inline attribution where key facts are stated.

  • Primary references: FDA Food Code, USDA FoodKeeper/CFS, CDC, WHO, government and university extensions.
  • Secondary references (industry/NGOs) only when they agree with primary guidance.
  • Outbound links use deep anchors to the exact section when possible.

Editorial Workflow

  1. Research: Collect current guidance from FDA/USDA and relevant extensions.
  2. Drafting: Create plain‑language guidance with clear “safe/unsafe” cues and storage steps.
  3. Expert Review: A food‑safety reviewer verifies accuracy and risk framing.
  4. Citations: Add inline citations for temperatures, time ranges, and risk notes.
  5. Update cadence: Pages are reviewed at least every 12 months or sooner if guidance changes.

Corrections & Feedback

If you spot an error, contact us via the About page. We log material corrections on the affected page with date and summary.

Reviewer Disclosure

Reviewers are independent and do not receive compensation tied to specific product or outcome claims. Sponsored content is labeled and does not alter safety guidance.